The First Quantitative Study on Corporate-Startup Partnering
"This is the first time we can take a comprehensive view of collaborations between European Startups and established companies." Prof. Dietmar Harhoff Ph.D, Managing Director, Max-Planck-Institute for Innovation und Competition
Qualified by Industry Experts
Why Venture Clienting?
Startups are being funded at an accelerated pace. Top Corporations learned how to leverage this source of innovation systematically - you can too.
Why is it relevant?
Venture Clienting drives innovation. It boosts corporate innovation and funds new Startups - the future Corporations, while economies worldwide benefit.
For Startups, the investor is not the differentiating factor between success and failure - the early customer is. Fabian Dudek, CEO @ GlassDollar
Access the Impact of Venture Clienting Volume I study now
With millions of new Startup products out there, how do Corporations know which ones they need? The answer lies in a structured approach of sourcing and testing.
The Impact of Venture Clienting Volume I study sheds light on the status quo and best practices Corporations employ when working with Startups, by adding the missing quantification of the phenomenon at scale. We hope this inspires further academic research and economic policy.
The Academic Perspective on Venture Clienting and it’s Success Factors
Prof. Dr.Theresa Treffers
7
min read
Expert Opinion
US vs Europe - The Cultural Tapestry of Venture Clienting
Philipp Willigmann
5
min read
Expert Opinion
Corporate Venturing Toolbox- Venture Client Model
Peter Borchers
7
min read
Fabian Dudek
Founder & CEO at GlassDollar
Big and small working together - that is nothing new, is it? It has existed since the inception of the corporation in 1347. Why, then, are innovation professionals now coining terms like Venture Clienting, Startup Partnering, and Collaboration? Why do we need to talk now about corporations and startups working together? The simple answer: because it is by collaborating with startups that corporations can afford the inevitable mistakes of innovation. We inevitably make mistakes when creating anything new. Corporations do not like mistakes; they are expensive. Startups, on the other hand, are designed to learn from mistakes effectively in terms of cost and time. With emerging challenges such as global warming, changing consumer expectations, and resource constraints - just to name a few - the demand for innovation (or change) in corporations is increasing. Small companies, or startups, offer this innovation. The number of startups founded each year is growing; last year, about 1.3 million new companies were founded, supported by $285 billion in venture capital. However, with millions of new startup products out there, how do corporations know which ones they need? The answer lies in a structured testing approach. This study sheds light on the best practices of corporations by adding the missing quantification of the phenomenon at scale, to inspire further academic research and economic policy.